The Metropolitan Police has lost a High Court case over its controversial process of removing officers and staff deemed unsuitable through enhanced vetting procedures. The ruling means that officers dismissed under the scheme must be reinstated, and some could even receive back pay.
The vetting process was introduced as part of the Met’s efforts to clean up the force following a series of high-profile scandals, including the kidnap and murder of Sarah Everard by former officer Wayne Couzens in 2021. However, judges have now ruled in favor of the Metropolitan Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, stating that the process was unlawful.
Met Commissioner Mark Rowley Furious Over Ruling
Met Commissioner Mark Rowley, who has vowed to reform the police force, expressed frustration at the ruling and is now considering an appeal. Rowley has repeatedly defended the vetting removal process, arguing that it is a crucial tool for removing corrupt or dangerous officers.
Under the scheme, if the Met received adverse information about an officer or staff member, their vetting status was reviewed. Losing clearance meant they were no longer eligible to access sensitive information or perform their duties. More than 100 officers and staff have already left the force due to these vetting reviews.
What Happens Next?
Following the ruling, the Met Police must reinstate officers and staff who were removed due to failed vetting, potentially leading to compensation claims and back pay. The ruling could also have wider implications for how police forces across the UK handle misconduct allegations and internal disciplinary measures.
While the Met faces yet another legal setback, the force insists that it remains committed to restoring public confidence and removing officers unfit for duty. Whether an appeal will overturn the ruling remains to be seen, but for now, the decision marks a significant blow to Rowley’s policing reform efforts.
